The ‘Danann’ case stands for the now well-recognized principle that a specific merger clause—one encompassing the representations that are the subject matter of the fraud claim—will likely bar a plaintiff’s fraud claim that looks outside the agreement. Recent Commercial Division decisions applying this ‘Danann’ standard are instructive as to how specific that clause must be.

Read the entire article.



Personnes-ressources

Co-Head of Litigation and Disputes, New York
Co-Partner-in-Charge, New York

Publications récentes

Abonnez-vous et restez à l’affût des nouvelles juridiques, informations et événements les plus récents...